Congress clearly never intended to prevent injured consumers from holding drug and device manufacturers accountable for their injuries. The Supreme Court already has issued one decision (Riegel v. Medtronic) eliminating consumers’ rights to hold device manufacturers accountable and allowing them to evade liability simply by virtue of receiving their initial FDA approval. This decision prevents injured victims, like the ones listed below, from holding negligent manufacturers accountable. And, if the Supreme Court had reached unfavorable decisions in these cases years ago, many of these victims and others like them would not have received compensation for their injuries.
In Memory of... | Mark Turnidge +We are contacted every day by people who have lost loved ones because of a faulty medical device. People who want to help make sure no one else suffers as they have. For that reason, it is important they have a forum to share their stories.
Mark David Turnidge went into the hospital on January 5, 2009, because his defibrillator was beeping and when a home monitor test was done, it showed the lead was likely fractured. He was advised to come into the hospital that night for observation and to have the lead potentially removed the next day. The cardiologist he saw on January 5th actually said she didn’t think it needed to be removed. When he was wheeled down to the pre-op area on January 6th, however, the surgeon came in and said they remove these all the time and it was a hour to two hour surgery. The surgeon mentioned that the lead could potentially be “fibrous.” I asked if that meant scar tissue and she said, “yes, but it just means it’s a little harder to remove and maybe adds an extra hour onto the surgery but we do these all the time and just did an 80 year old man yesterday”.
I called everyone I could think of and posted on caringbridge (you can go back to 1-6-09 and see the entire thing as it played out for the next days). Before we knew it, the waiting room was flooded with 40-50 people or more and they came to retrieve me and bring me to somewhere private. The surgeon told us that they got the hole fixed -- a 3 ½ finger sized hole in his Vena Cava because the lead had implanted itself into the tissue and the laser to remove it ripped through the SVC). Shortly after telling us this, the surgeon ran out of the room and down the hall. I found out later that Mark went into cardiac arrest and had a bunch of other awful things happen to him.
When we were allowed to see Mark, they warned us he may be a little swollen and blue. I fortunately took a before picture and several after pictures and he was more than swollen and blue. They said they fixed the hole but he was without oxygen to his brain for a long time and “may” have suffered brain damage. By Wednesday morning, the small amount of brain stem function he had was gone and by Thursday, I was faced with the decision to pull life support on the love of my life, my high school sweetheart, best friend and father of my son. The most amazing thing is how he died, with his arms raised during a song that he died to (from start to finish) and at the end, it says “fly to Jesus” and his arms lifted straight off the bed and by the very last word of the song, his heart stopped beating.
This has been the worst tragedy of my whole life. I have suffered with my own health problems but my husband was vibrant, healthy, active, funny and known all around as a goofball. He was a poet and wrote me many beautiful and touching poems, some of which I share openly on my caringbridge site.
I love him and miss him and he leaves behind myself, our son Lance who is now 4 and his first son from a prior relationship who is 12. Senseless and tragic is how I describe this whole situation.
Mark was wheeled away and his mother and I went to the cafeteria and I had the beeper. Hours passed and we were curious as to why things were taking so long. I got back up to the cardiac catheterization floor and we sat talking and reading the paper. A nurse later came out to say we needed to come back immediately, as Mark was being rushed to the OR. My heart sunk but in shock I said, “is this serious, like could he die?” and she said, “this is catastrophic.” After several minutes, we heard people running with a cart with Mark on it and as it came around the corner we saw at least 8 people in blue scrubs, yelling how his blood pressure was in the 50’s. As he was wheeled past me, I saw he had on a vent and I could barely see his whiskers and he was out of it. I saw iodine all over his chest and that was the last I saw of him for several more hours.
Mark’s Wife
On March 8, 2009, Fox News Twin Cities did a report on Medtronic Sprint Fidelis lead patients. This piece underscores the need for immediate action!
Watch the Video
Ray Thompson (Mississippi) | full story +
Problem: In a single day, Ray Thompson was shocked 90 times by his malfunctioning implanted Medtronic defibrillator. Despite having the lead in his device surgically replaced, Ray continues to experience ..
FDA’s involvement: The Medtronic defibrillator received FDA approval through the most stringent pre-market approval (PMA) process. However, it is still unclear whether the Sprint Fidelis lead inside the defibrillator received FDA approval under the 510(k) approval process, which is an expedited approval process for devices that are “substantially equivalent” to those already on the market. The FDA reportedly took less than 30 days to approve Medtronic’s submission for the ultimately defective Sprint Fidelis lead.
Status: Due to Mr. Thompson’s health problems from the defibrillator, he has had to sell some of his land, and continues to work (at 70 years old) just to pay for additional medical bills that are not covered by his Medicare supplement. As a result of the Riegel v. Medtronic decision, Mr. Thompson understands that he will likely not be able to pursue an individual claim further.
Bridget Robb (Pennsylvania) | full story +
Problem: 34-year-old Bridget Robb was woken up by a series of shocks to her heart when the Sprint Fidelis lead in her Medtronic defibrillator began malfunctioning. She was shocked for a total of 31 times over a ..
FDA’s involvement: See Ray Thompson’s story above (first story).
Status: Though Bridget’s insurance company has been covering her medical care, she will likely experience much higher insurance premiums as a result of her injuries. Ms. Robb’s attorneys have also told her that because of the Riegel v. Medtronic decision, a jury will likely never hear her case.
Judd Orcutt (Oregon) | full story +
Problem: During his National Guard service, Judd sustained a spinal cord injury when his humvee wrecked. In an effort to reduce the level of pain from his injury, Judd had his herniated disc replaced with an ..
FDA’s involvement: The Charite artificial disc received FDA approval through the most stringent pre-market approval (PMA) process, based on a single 2-year noninferiority trial that was only intended to demonstrate that the Charite disc worked just as well as the Bagby and Kuslich (BAK) cage -- another device abandoned due to high failure rates. Experts agree that such a short clinical trial was inadequate for approving a device intended for a lifetime. Furthermore, DePuy Spine’s literature on the device notes that “The Charite Artificial Disc has a clinical history spanning 17 years.”
Status: Claims against DePuy Spine for misleading consumers about the safety and efficacy of the Charite disc have routinely been preempted. Judd is unable to afford the surgery he needs and continues to suffer extreme pain and bouts of paralysis.
Donald Hickey (Kansas) | full story +
Problem: Donald Hickey was surgically implanted with a Medtronic defibrillator in 2005. Two years later, he experienced 16 electric shocks in a single day when his defibrillator malfunctioned. Donald immediately ..
FDA’s involvement: See Ray Thompson’s story above (first story).
Status: Following the Riegel v. Medtronic decision, Medtronic immediately attempted to have Donald’s claim dismissed. This action caused Donald’s original attorney to drop his claim, as it became too expensive for him to continue handling Don’s case.
Madeline Wallace (Maine) | full story +
Problem: Madeline Wallace was blown off her feet while grocery shopping in January 2007, when she was shocked by her malfunctioning implanted Medtronic defibrillator. She was shocked an additional three ..
FDA’s involvement: See Ray Thompson’s story, above (first story).
Status: Though Madeline is a Navy vet with some health insurance, her medical bills to correct the faulty lead have exceeded $70,000. Her attorney has not yet filed her claim, due to concerns that it will be preempted by Riegel v. Medtronic.
Barry Notmeyer (California) | full story +
Problem: In 2004, Barry Notmeyer underwent total left hip arthroplasty and was implanted with a prosthetic hip replacement called the Trident. Two months later, a component of the Trident shattered, and Barry ..
FDA's involvement: This component had received FDA approval under the 510(k) approval process, which is an expedited approval process for devices that are "substantially equivalent" to those already on the market.
Status: At the federal trial court level, the judge denied the manufacturer's claim that it was immune by virtue of its FDA approval and allowed Barry to move forward with his case.
Adam Hendelson (Florida) | full story +
Problem: Twenty-eight year old Adam Hendelson was given a Duragesic patch containing the narcotic painkiller fentanyl to address chronic pain that developed as a result of an automobile accident he had ..
FDA’s involvement: In July 2005, the FDA launched a probe into 120 deaths linked to the patches. After a two and a half year investigation, the FDA finally issued a public health advisory regarding the patches in December 2007 but did not mandate a change to the label.
Status: A jury awarded Adam’s family damages for his injuries.
Negligent Manufacturers Must Be Held Accountable
Have you been injured by a faulty medical device? Tell us your story.







